.Net Core: What Is New In ASP.NET Core 2.0


ASP.NET is the next evolution of Microsoft for the web pages that are supposed to be server driven. Rather than modifying and amending the ASP and adding new features and functionalities into it, new software called the ASP.NET has come up. It is completely and overhauls as it provides an interface for programming that lets the developers keep coding in an advanced way for the internet. These are the developers who are familiar with the concepts of Visual Basic as well as the other tools that are based on the development of relations between client and server. The most well-known providers of hosting services support the technologies that have a .NET extension; they support both ASP.NET core 2.0 and ASP.NET core 3.5.  The new .net core 2.0 features are also supported by these providers.

Things to know about the latest ASP.NET Core 2.0:

In the latest ASP.NET core 2.0 hosting those developers who have a past record of developing different stuff in the world of client and server are allowed for transferring their skills seamlessly to the web. Those developers and programmers who also have been writing programs in different languages including Java, Visual Basic, C++, etc. for the purpose of development on the internet are allowed for using the already existing components. This lets them keep working with their web pages of ASP.NET core and the web forms as well. In the latest release of ASP.NET, these functionalities have been enhanced to a great level.
What Is New In ASP.NET Core 2.0

New features added in ASP.NET core:

Support for Razor Pages

The support for Razor pages is one of the features that have been recently added to the functionality of ASP.NET core. MVC has the same features as the Razor pages.

New framework capabilities

The APIs, as well as the ability for referencing the complete Framework Libraries, has been expanded in the .NET core 2.0.

New OS addons

There is an expanded support of Operating System.

New Optimisations

Now .NET core is supported by the Visual Beginners All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code. It allows the users to make console applications and the class libraries.

Csproj is the new game

The project files of xproj are to be replaced by the csproj’s new version.

Legacy Support

The MS builds have started working again in the new version.

New updates for visual studio

There are certain tooling enhancements done by Visual Studio 2017 in the new version of .NET.


You should keep over viewing ASP.NET Core 2.0, and its latest versions so that you do not miss out any of its new functionalities. Recently, the tools for developers and the integration of the database for the latest version of ASP.NET have also been designed in such a way that it becomes very easy to use. By following the easy steps, you can go for .net core 2.0 download and further explore about the software.

Suggested Reading



From time to time and there is a need to join information from numerous tables or perspectives into one extensive data set. This might be for tables with comparable data inside a similar database or perhaps there is a need to consolidate comparative data crosswise over databases or even across servers. In this article we will analyse how to use UNION versus UNION ALL commands and how they contrast. In my previous article, I explained differences between a clustered and a non-clustered index.

Optimal Performance Comparison Union vs. Union All

The UNION command is utilised to choose the related data from two tables, which resembles a JOIN command. In any case, when utilising UNION order, all the chose columns should be of similar data type. With UNION, just distinct values are chosen.
UNION ALL command is equivalent to UNION command, aside from that UNION ALL chooses every values. Hence, it does not remove any duplicate values.
Since this does not evacuate duplicate values this procedure is speedier, but rather on the off chance that you don't need duplicate records you should utilise the UNION command.
The decision is easy if you know the answer to the Question "Would i like to take out duplicate rows when I join 2 result sets with this operation?”
On the off chance that yes, at that point use UNION . In any case, know that a UNION will make the additional stride of checking the outcome set and giving you ONLY unmistakable rows. So it will perform slower on the grounds that it needs to sort the result set.
On the off chance that its ensured that your two result sets which you need to join won't have any overlapping rows, or you couldn't care less if there are duplicate/over lapping rows, at that point you should use UNION ALL. Since UNION ALL does not need to make the additional stride of checking the result sets and separating just the unique values, so UNION ALL is generally preferable performing over UNION, since it doesn't need to sort the result set.


Creating Database Tables For Check Comparison

create table compareUnionvUnionaAll (col varchar(10))

insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll values ('technology')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll values ('crowds')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll values ('sql')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll values ('.net')

create table compareUnionvUnionaAll1 (col varchar(10))

insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll1 values ('android')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll1 values ('MEAN')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll1 values ('sql')
insert into compareUnionvUnionaAll1 values ('.net')
List Records From Both Tables
SELECT * FROM compareUnionvUnionaAll;
SELECT * FROM compareUnionvUnionaAll1;

Results Overview

Table Results Overview

Lets Execute Union All Command

select * from compareUnionvUnionaAll
Union ALL
select * from compareUnionvUnionaAll1

Result Overview of Union ALL Command

Result Overview of Union ALL Command

Lets Check Execution Plan For Union ALL Optimal Comparison

Check Execution Plan For Union ALL Optimal Comparison

UNION Command Results Overview

select * from compareUnionvUnionaAll
select * from compareUnionvUnionaAll1
UNION Command Results Overview

Lets Check For Union Optimal Comparison

Check For Union Optimal Comparison

I think you may notice that UNION query cost is more than UNION ALL which is marked red (63%).


UNION and UNION ALL collated as they are completely apart from each other, they both have different purposes.

Relevant Reading

Angular 4: What is New in Angular 4


In the realm of web application development, Angular is viewed as a standout amongst other open-source JavaScript frameworks. Angular 2 was released on September 14, 2016 and roughly 6 month after the release of Angular 2 , Angular 4 was made available.The final version was released on March 23, 2017. Let's examine why this update was released and what it adds to web development.

What is New in Angular 4

What is new in ANGULAR 4 and how it differs from ANGULAR 2?

When contrasted with Angular 2, there are heaps of new things added. New components as well as a few changes that enhanced old abilities. So how about we proceed onward to see the list.

  • Compact and Faster: With Angular 4, projects will expend less space and run faster than past variants.
  • View Engine size reduced: Size of view engine is reduced by approximately 60 percent.
  • Animation package: Angular 4.0 have pulled the animations out of @angular/core and set them into their own package. This means that if we don’t use animations, the extra code will not end up in production bundles.
  • *ngIf and *ngFor: NgIf syntax is extended to support the else clause to show the template when the condition is false.
  • Angular Universal: With Angular Universal, it's conceivable to render Angular applications outside of the program, for example specifically on the web server.
  • Compatible with Type Script 2.1 and 2.2: Type security of Angular applications and the speed of ngc-Compiler have been elevated.
  • Templates: Source maps are for templates too.Template Compiler will create source maps  for templates.

ANGULAR 4 Tutorial

The Video tutorial on Angular 4 is available on the YouTube channel Technology Crowds link is here.


Developers who have knowledge of AngularJS and Angular 2 will find the new update easy and helpful to use. With this new update Angular has shown the world that they are always ready to listen to developers’ community.

Suggested Reading


What are the differences between a clustered and a non-clustered index


Hope you liked my previous article on Understanding The Relationships in SQL Server. In this article, I am going to discuss clustered and non-clustered indexes in SQL. An index is a disk structure related with a table or view that accelerates the extraction of rows from the table or view. It contains keys created from one or more columns in the table or view. These keys are stored in a B-tree structure that allows SQL Server to rapidly and proficiently discover the rows associated with the key values.
differences between a clustered and a non-clustered index

SQL supports two types of indexes:

  • Clustered index
  • Non-clustered index

Clustered index

Clustered indexes sorts and stores data in table or view based on their key values. There is only one clustered index per table and this table with clustered index is known as clustered table.

Non-Clustered index

Non-clustered indexes have a separate structure from data rows. A non-clustered index comprises of non-clustered index key values. Each one of these key value entry has a pointer to the data rows that includes the key value. It is important for columns that have repeated values.

Difference between Clustered and Non-clustered index in SQL

The difference between clustered and non-clustered indexes is one of the most asked questions during interviews.
Given below are some of the differences between clustered and non-clustered indexes:
  1. Clustered index sorts data rows whereas non-clustered doesn't.
  2. One table can have one clustered index, but there is no such condition on non-clustered index.
  3. In many databases, a clustered index is directly made on primary key.
  4. Clustered Index is more faster to non clustered index because non clustered  physically stored in index order. 
  5. Non clustered index is more faster for insert and update rather than clustered index.
  6. Clustered index is stored logical so it don't require extra storage.


That’s all on difference between clustered and non-clustered indexes in SQL. Both indexes are extremely critical in SQL.

Relevant Reading


How to avoid duplicate records in SQL view using Entity Framework


Sometimes while using SQL we experience that SQL query returns same or duplicate results. Since we expect and need a single result from the query, it is a problem. Here we will discuss what causes duplicate records and how to avoid them in SQL view using Entity Framework.

You can also know about how to Fix SQL error: 26 - A network-related error occurred in SQL Server by reading my previous article.

Duplicate rows in Entity Framework SQL View 

In Entity Framework primary key is known as entity key. Entity Framework auto set fields as entity key for those not null column and return the row that match those entity key that causes the problem.
The problem is on the application side Entity framework mapping, as object mapping rules in Entity framework are different with database. The Entity framework does the mapping on application memory with accordance to its designed logic when the query results returns from database. Entity Model has a unique way of handling rows with equal primary key values. To fix issue duplicate records in SQL view using Entity Framework, you need to write below code:
 How to avoid duplicate records in SQL view using Entity Framework

You can set AsNoTracking option directly on your view to resolve this issue.

context.myviewname.AsNoTracking().Where(x => x.ColumnName != null);


To avoid this problem the primary key columns should be chosen correctly. If primary key couldn't be chosen correctly due to null-values, we add a column to our view that always have a unique value for each row and make it primary key in entity model and set AsNoTracking. This is how explained  How to avoid duplicate records in SQL view using Entity Framework.

Relevant Reading


HTML: Difference Between Id And Name In Html


Web development is a very vast topic as it covers a lot of materials, and even sometimes professional web developers cannot remember all of it.
Here we will be discussing the difference between name attribute and ID attribute in HTML.
Difference Between Id And Name In Html


Name attribute in HTML indicates the name of an <input> element. The Name attribute is used to reference form data after a form is submitted or to reference elements in JavaScript. The name attribute is used for posting or sending data in a form submission in DOM (document object model).


ID attribute indicates a unique ID for HTML element. The ID attribute is mostly used in CSS, and by JavaScript who controls the element with the unique ID. The ID of a form has nothing to do with the data and information contained in it.
Both name attribute and ID attribute appear to have same purpose that of giving an identifier. The distinction is a name attribute exchanges transfers program to server and can be different in relation to the ID. ID is relied upon to be unique within the page.


Name and ID vary because the server is expecting the similar name from various forms in the similar document. The ID must be unique, the name most certainly not.

Suggested Reading

Key Relationships: Understanding The Relationships in SQL Server

A web application is a client-server software application in which the user interface runs in a web browser.Modern web applications today interact with databases , usually with a language called SQL. SQL (Structure Query Language) is a language designed for interacting with relational database management systems (RDBMS) like SQL Server, MySQL, Oracle, Sq Lite etc. In my earlier article, I explained about how to fix SQL network error 26.


The Relational database management systems are based on relational model. The relational model for database management is an approach to managing data using a structure and language consistent with first-order predicate logic. It is a prescription for how to represent and manipulate data. The purpose of the relational model is to provide a declarative method for specifying data and queries: users directly state what information the database contains and what information they want from it, and allow database management software ensure that it describes data structures for storing the data and retrieval procedures for answering queries.
Most relational databases use the SQL data definition and query language; these systems implement what can be regarded as an engineering approximation to the relational model. A table in an SQL database scheme corresponds to a predicate variable; the contents of a table to a relation; key constraints, other constraints, and SQL queries correspond to predicates.
Database designs are closely associated with database relationships, the association among two columns in a single or more tables.In SQL server, these relationships are defined using Primary Key-Foreign Key constraints. A link is created between two tables where the primary key of one table is associated with the foreign key of another table using database relationships.Now you must be wondering what is the key? Well Key is a set of one or more columns whose combined values are unique among all occurrences in a given table. A key is the relational means of specifying uniqueness.

What are the different types of relationships in SQL?

  • One-to-One
  • One-to-Many
  • Many-to-Many

One-to-One Relationships

This is relationship between the primary and foreign keys relationships with primary key relating to foreign key only one record. A One-to-One relationship means that we have two tables that have a relationship, but that relationship only exists in such a way that any given row from Table A can have at most one matching row in Table B.
A real world example of this could be the relationship between a person and a drivers license. A person cannot have more than one driving licence and in reverse a licence cannot be owned by more than one person. This is a one-to-one relationship. Other examples could be: Person-to-mailing address , school-to-principal , person-to-passport,etc. It is called one-to-one because you can have only one record pointing to one other record.
one-to-one relationship
A generic example of a one-to-one relationship.

One-to-Many Relationships

This is the most commonly used type of relationship.This is also relationship between primary & foreign keys relationships but here primary key relating to multiple records.The One-to-Many relationship is defined as a relationship between two tables where a row from one table can have multiple matching rows in another table.
The common example of a one to many relationship is when we're talking about Users and Addresses. A User can have one or more addresses (mailing and billing address).The key here is that any one address can only belong to one user and only one user.
A one-to-many relationship
A one-to-many relationship from the perspective of TABLE B

Many-to-Many Relationships

In a Many-to-Many relationship, a record in Table B can potentially belong to several records in Table A. And vice versa, a record in Table A can potentially belong to several records in Table B. A simple many-to-many relationship includes two dimensions.
The many-to-many database relationship is used when the rows in the first table can map to multiple rows in the second table and those rows in the second table can also map to multiple different rows in the first table.

Common examples of Many-to-Many include:

  • Doctors have many patients; patients have many doctors.
  • Customers have many bank accounts; bank accounts might belong to more than one customer.
  • Students are enrolled in many courses; each course has many students.

many-to-many relationship
A typical example of a many-to-many relationship


There are, without a doubt, any number of ways in which you can relate the tables in these examples , depending on each table's role within a given database. The manner in which we use the examples here is not important; But the technique we use establish the relationship between these tables is. Once we learn these techniques, we can identify and establish relationships between the tables .

Relevant Reading